🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has stated it is claiming damages amounting to $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move is a clear response from the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

According to accounts in Russian state media, the central bank initiated a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to determine later this week regarding a plan to use around €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and economic needs.

Most of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

A Clash Over Legality

EU authorities have argued that their plan is legally sound. They argue rests on the fact that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions shortly after the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. It has warned of retaliatory actions, including seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a key role in peace negotiations, wrote on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

With statements seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the assets plan as "a severe attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States."

Euroclear refused to provide a statement on the latest legal action. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with over 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

While courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce judgments from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic states, provided that relevant holdings can be identified," commented a lawyer from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials indicated they are developing steps to discourage other nations from assisting any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the cash earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the principal funds would stay untouched.

Ukraine would only be required to repay the money if and when Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction inflicted during the ongoing war.

Other Funding Ideas

Belgium, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an different approach for financing Ukraine. This entails joint EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, however, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it is not drawn from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you have to pay for the rebuilding."